[r-t] ?CCBR meeting - Methcom proposals
tjbarnes23 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 4 16:47:45 UTC 2016
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:56 AM, John Harrison <john at jaharrison.me.uk> wrote:
> That might have been part of it, but the fundamental reason surely is that
> with peals required to use only types of method that have been defined, and
> with the type definition based on categorisation, it follows that anything
> that has been defined, and may thus be used, has also been categorised.
Well, the existing Decisions could easily be modified to remove the Hybrid
classification (for example), without preventing the rest of the document
from working the way it does. A (formerly) Hybrid method would still be a
hunt method (or hunter). The difference is that being a hunt method
doesn't, by itself, lead to a word being inserted into the method's title.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Tim Barnes <tjbarnes23 at gmail.com> wrote:
> *Alliance Method:* A Hunt Method or Differential Hunt Method in which:
> 1. The Path of the Hunt Bell is the same if it is rung backwards;
> 2. The Hunt Bell does not ring the same number of times in each Place
> within a Plain Lead; and
> 3. The Hunt Bell Makes a Place exactly twice within a Plain Lead, exactly
> one of which is in 1st's Place
On further thought, I don't think this is what RAS intended for Alliance.
The above would allow a pointy hunt bell path (i.e. 'big dodges' such as
point 6th's, point 4th's), whereas I think RAS only intended hunting or
regular one-place dodges. The following would correct this (I think), and
also seems better:
*Alliance Method:* A Hunt Method or Differential Hunt Method in which:
1. The Path of the Hunt Bell is the same if it is rung backwards;
2. The Hunt Bell rings either twice or four times in each Place within a
Plain Lead; and
3. The Hunt Bell Makes a Place exactly twice within a Plain Lead
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ringing-theory