[r-t] Methods Committee proposed change 3.0(D)

Mark Davies mark at snowtiger.net
Fri Mar 24 23:33:34 UTC 2017

Chris Adams writes,

> But wouldn't this allow a peal of Triples consisting of 4040
 > changes that occur only once and 500 changes that occur twice?

No, because the N/N+1 wording is quite careful: "none of the possible 
rows for each effective stage shall appear more than once more than any 
other of the possible rows".

In your example, of the 5040 possible rows at the Triples stage, 4040 
rows appear once, 500 rows appear twice, and another 500 rows appear 
zero times. "Twice" is "more than once more" than "no times".


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list