[r-t] Methods Committee proposed change 3.0(D)

Chris02 chris02 at shropshirelad.plus.com
Sat Mar 25 00:01:51 UTC 2017

Chris Adams writes,
> But wouldn't this allow a peal of Triples consisting of 4040
> changes that occur only once and 500 changes that occur twice?

Mark Davies replied:
> No, because the N/N+1 wording is quite careful: "none of the
> possible rows for each effective stage shall appear more than
> once more than any other of the possible rows".
> In your example, of the 5040 possible rows at the Triples stage,
> 4040 rows appear once, 500 rows appear twice, and another 500
> rows appear zero times. "Twice" is "more than once more" than
> "no times".

Ah, and in a peal of Major 5000 rows appear once and 35320 appear zero times.
Got it - Thanks Mark.

Chris Adams

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list