[r-t] Extension question

[Graham John]

On 5 November 2017 at 23:54, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:

> If a band were to ring the following royal method, the obvious extension of
> Semiquincentenary Alliance Major: x3x4x25x36x47x58x6x7x8.9,2
>
> would they be:
> - required to call is Semiquincentenary?
> - prohibited from calling it Semiquincentenary?
> - or allowed to call it Semiquincentenary if they so chose, but also to call
> it something else if they preferred?

Decision D.3.b says: Methods at different stages in the same type and
class that are uniquely related as in Parts A to D of the Decision on
Method Extension shall have the same name, and where not uniquely
related one relationship shall have the same name.

In this case the two are uniquely related, so would be required to
have the same name.

Graham