[r-t] Extension question

[Don Morrison]

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk>
wrote:
> If you look at related methods under
> https://complib.org/method/26928, you will see that there are other
> candidate extension constructions, but none going to Royal, which
> was Don's example. That's why I said that it was unique. It is not a
> requirement in the decisions, but I also would have thought that an
> extension construction that works at every stage would normally be
> preferred over one that didn't.

Ah, so a band ringing the royal *could* name it something else if they
chose, as one of the other extension paths, albeit not one with a stop
along the way in royal, could then be called Semiquincentenary. And, in
that case, no method at royal could then be called Semiquincentenary
Alliance Royal. Right?


-- 
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"The important thing to know about an assassination or an
attempted assassination is not who fired the shot, but who
paid for the bullet.   -- Eric Ambler, _A Coffin for Dimitrios_
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20171106/289f118e/attachment-0001.html>