[r-t] MUG Minor Revisited

[Graham John]

Barrie wrote:

> Very pleasing and neat Graham.  Does the 1296 have the n,n+1 row property that would allow
> it to be rung to a peal? My reading of the rules suggest that ringing it 4 times would not meet
> the rules as they stand.  Seems a pity.

Yes, it contains 1 complete extent and 1 partial extent. However,
repeating it would not give a true peal length. It would be very nice
if a 7+1 extent block were possible with bobs only, wouldn't it.

Graham