[r-t] MUG Minor Revisited

[Graham John]

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, 20:33 Philip Saddleton, <pabs at cantab.net> wrote:

> But I think it would be better to affect all of the bells (otherwise you
> could construe it as a Treble Place method with a lead of 48 rows).
>

I don't understand the logic of considering it a TP method. It would have
calls at three different places in a single lead method (block?). Surely,
thinking of it as a principle is simpler and less for ringers to learn. You
wouldn't say the same of Stedman compositions with a bell unaffected would
you?

Also, this particular 1440 does not give a true 360 of Original.

Graham

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.org/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20180825/c18689a3/attachment.html>