[r-t] MUG Minor Revisited

[Philip Saddleton]

On Sat, 2018-08-25 at 00:45 +0100, Graham John wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, 20:33 Philip Saddleton, <pabs at cantab.net> wrote:
> > But I think it would be better to affect all of the bells
> > (otherwise you could construe it as a Treble Place method with a
> > lead of 48 rows).
> 
> I don't understand the logic of considering it a TP method. It would
> have calls at three different places in a single lead method
> (block?). Surely, thinking of it as a principle is simpler and less
> for ringers to learn. You wouldn't say the same of Stedman
> compositions with a bell unaffected would you?
> 

I suppose not - I was thinking more of the Single Court example.

> Also, this particular 1440 does not give a true 360 of Original.
> 

Interesting - I hadn't realized that.

Here is one with fewer calls:

https://complib.org/composition/42059?accessKey=8a29c75dec7a1d74fb4c86e
921d02dbbcebf3972

PABS