[r-t] Framework v2

John Harrison john at jaharrison.me.uk
Mon Jun 14 11:58:37 BST 2021


In article
<CA+16xEdsai9Z9ag0h2xoHdL0prFNEVfdP77H9N3B0E0Kqh+cjw at mail.gmail.com>,
   Tim Barnes <tjbarnes23 at gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
> ... standardizing on a QP are consistency across stages ... to 'earn'
> naming rights.  ... would be overturning several centuries of method
> ringing practice. 

Is that true?  AFIA there were no rules about naming methods until the CC
decided to try to impose some order.  

In the 1920s the Council still claimed the right to name methods itself but
later relented.  Does anyone know when the current rule (peal on 7+ and
extent on 6-) was first formalised?  It's in the 1968 Decisions but I can't
track down when it was first accepted.

-- 
John Harrison
Website http://jaharrison.me.uk
Using 4té and ARMX6, both running RISC OS



More information about the ringing-theory mailing list