[Bell Historians] Re: Thin Bells

[matthewhigby at a...]

In a message dated 27/06/2002 13:15:06 GMT Daylight Time, djb122 at y... 
writes:


> if Matthew's rung there and
> says they are E I think we can take it as read that they are!
> 
> 

Ill have to say - all I can remember is that they were a really good resonant 
ring of 6 - It was a long time ago that I rang there so I would'nt bet on 
anything!

HBW (1929) states the details to be

1 G Mears 1849 4-0-10
2 G Mears 1849 4-0-19
3 G Mears 1849 5-0-24
4 Warner 1877 6-0-0
5 Roger Purdue 1664 8-0-0
6 Roger Purdue 1664 10-0-0 in G.

I think Gilletts had a go at them after this - Ill try ang get over there 
sometime.

Cheers

Matthew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20020627/0f8a89e5/attachment.html>