[Bell Historians] Southwark cathedral

Andrew Bull andrew.bull at t...
Tue Jan 25 11:35:08 GMT 2005


charset="iso-8859-1"

Was the work done in the tower? If so, the exact weights given for the front
six, presumably from the 1947 retuning, will no long be correct.

Andrew Bull

-----Original Message-----
From: nigelsdtaylor [mailto:nigeltaylor at k...]
Sent: 24 January 2005 13:46
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bell Historians] Southwark cathedral



The front 6 did have canons until the 1965 rehang, and 11, 10, 9, and 
8 had false staples which were removed, and the bells drilled for 
independent staples.
When the bells were tuned, the nominal of the tenor was only lowered 
a few cycles to 476 Hz., this was the minimum amount of flattening 
(given that the bells are on a fairly thin scale) sufficient to lower 
the hum to a flat 7th. The pitch is slightly flat of old English 
concert (Bb=481), and sharp of modern, international pitch 
(Bb=466.2). There was then, no question of tuning the bells to be as 
flat or flatter than St. Pauls.
Nigel Taylor 







______________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20050125/46079db8/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list