[Bell Historians] Re: Rudhall Rings

Andrew Higson andrew_higson at VSUozUFNg7-rp2pG8URtFsbQOwyd60Gvh__jCTfw7oRtbFvo3rIprWBsgXqG6kIG7Rr5FlwxOzFPTPSpI5XFPyGdS-KH5bZC.yahoo.invalid
Wed Nov 15 09:38:56 GMT 2006

Almost right, David. Our rehang was in 1901, though. The more recent
work of replacing the trebles and adding the flat sixth were done by
-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Bryant
Sent: 15 November 2006 09:19
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bell Historians] Re: Rudhall Rings

> Rings like St Giles Lincoln and Wrexham are truly
> superb, plus the many other lesser known rings of 5
> and. 6

I believe both of the above have been tuned by Taylor's. The back ten 
at Painswick (Abraham II) are still in their original state apart from 
having the canons removed - Taylor's were not allowed to tune them when 
they rehung them in 1999.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20061115/200b759f/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list