[Bell Historians] Spot the mistake

David Bryant davidbryant at Z6ZYuzT8bDQt0MB2OumeMpm7-PpwlUHESsGnh053tVMirfq6rQ410oelqV5B1ibAbeXkhNAYOxbk1xU63_g7WFak.yahoo.invalid
Mon Sep 3 22:20:02 BST 2007

No, that isn't the mistake I was referring to!




-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of macstyle2004
Sent: 03 September 2007 22:18
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Spot the mistake


--- In bellhistorians@ <mailto:bellhistorians%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com, "David Bryant"
<davidbryant at ...> wrote:
> > There is an obvious mistake here - does anyone know what the
> is? (I'll let you work out what it is - anyone claiming to be a bell
> historian should be able to spot it easily enough!)
> Spot the mistake, that is - I've no idea what the explanation is
> undoubtedly there is one.

Is it that St Botolph's Church, Sibson says they have two 'new' bells
to augment, when it should say two 'second hand bells' as the newest
bells in the tower are 1912 Taylors tenor and 1921 Gillet and Johnson



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20070903/ebd20765/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list