[Bell Historians] Re: The Redundant Bells of St Nicholas, Cork - Ringing ...

[jshe726707 at S5WPfu8-t216ZECDiYF3cIVT-6GZFHvDstFg7ciO777X1qWaZ_0SUrz0dsUpTSFQldAVLujfNkBa.yahoo.invalid]

In a message dated 29/09/2007 13:46:35 GMT Daylight Time,  
richard.offen at NFDOr-NrYxd_eS3BLnbqQILRNaUO-ORTi9SkB3UJLI4j8JVaPzuwydA9GAxY982jiZ85y_9pAcUXs3Al53Gnpg.yahoo.invalid writes:

What  is more important is the need to prioritise the use of what 
funds are  availble, and I must admit I wouldn't give an inferior 
(only my opinion I  know)Murphy eight a particularly high priority, 
especially as there are  others about ...it has to be said I also 
wouldn't give a ninteenth century  Mears ring much of a priority 
either


One can go on prioritising ( horrid word ) until the cows come home .  
However if nothing gets done that hardly will be a good advertisement for  ringers . 
I agree that there are some pretty appalling Mears 19th rings about ,  and 
there isn't too much that can be said for their preservation .  Likewise and I 
regret to say this but there are a few recent Taylor jobs  that fall IMHO into 
the same category .
 
 
Jim  



   
           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20070929/b60918d6/attachment.html>