Alan Buswell's "new survey" (RW, page 541)

[Nick Bowden]

John Baldwin writes: 

> I have just sent Alan what I hope is the raw data for the new survey
> he proposes at the end of the article; it is appended below.   
> 
> Please let me (and Alan) know if I have mis-classified any of them
> (ie, are there any missing, is there an entry which should not be there?) 
> 
> 2005  8 Baldersby                          /     

There's bound to be some comment about Baldersby, which of course, are not a 
new ring, but reclassified as a ring since the last edition of Dove. I 
wonder if they will ever out again.....
Nick