Restorations etc

[Nick Bowden]

David Cawley writes:
>   I believe that in three or the four  long (serious) contributions made by Rod Bickerton and myself it was necessary to follow on the original text in extenso. Certainly, bad netiquette was not intended. 
> 

I agree. In this case you can see exactly who has said what (and when). I 
can never understand certain contributors when they quote very little or 
worse, nothing at all. By all means edit things, but in context. It can be 
very frustrating trying to find who actually said something in the first 
place. 

I also wonder why some subscribers choose to only receive the digest?
Nick