[Bell Historians] Cornhill, was Trafalgar Square old & new
Michael Wilby
michael.wilby at aGhcsPzZWKbPPtki8qAeCNinXK9Nj7EakmsVvAPTAjiX0D4K7W8k6vCOS1tnCRfIilQ8IHsgB87xwhMxH0jZ.yahoo.invalid
Tue Mar 10 22:16:29 GMT 2009
This is all rather silly. Cornhill are a poor example of an old-style ring - take a look at them: they're mainly 20th century - much that is "old" about them has long gone. It's a completely different situation to St Martin-in-the-Fields which were an historic ring, partially tuned and poorly clappered (and now very good at Swan).
In practical terms Cornhill bells are too big for the tower: they require a two tier frame (5 on 7) so low down that the intermediate chamber is inadequate for sound balancing. Best to start again with a better plan.
And if you want old-style go to St Paul's, St Sepulchre's or Southwark - all much finer in those terms, and enjoyed by many. Let Cornhill have the decent ring it has never had.
--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Richard Offen" <richard.offen at ...> wrote:
>
> It remains to be seen if reducing the tenor by about half a ton makes any
> difference to the amount of tower movement at Cornhill.
>
>
>
> It will be a sad day when the only rings of twelve we have are all
> true-harmonic (fairly unlikely I know, but we are going in that direction),
> we shall have lost an important link with the history of change ringing
> ...thank goodness the Swan Bells aren't going anywhere!
>
>
>
> R
>
>
>
> I think that at Cornhill there's also issues about the suitability of
>
> the current ring for the tower. They're somewhat crammed-in on two
>
> tiers, and if memory serves I think the tower rocked about somewhat. But
>
> I see Rod's point about "interesting" and "different" twelves being
>
> replaced with identikit modern rings.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Andrew Bull
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
>
> [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bickerton, Roderic
>
> (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
>
> Sent: 10 March 2009 12:00
>
> To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
>
> Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Cornhill, was Trafalgar Square old & new
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Any chance of coming back to ideas on Cornhill?
>
>
>
> SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited
>
> Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex
>
> SS14 3EL
>
> A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132
>
> ********************************************************************
>
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
>
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
>
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
>
> distribute its contents to any other person.
>
> ********************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>
> Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.9/1993 - Release Date: 03/10/09
> 07:19:00
>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list