[Bell Historians] More Telegraph letters

[John H Allen]

I know that I worked with EE for 31 years so perhaps I am biased but I have
always found it open and clear.

 

John

 

 

  _____  

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of David Bryant
Sent: Tuesday 17 November 2009 18:44
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] More Telegraph letters

 

  

"Consider the situation at Hanley which is subject to secular planning
control and is likely to cause the bells to rot in situ. I can say from
personal experience that if Hanley was still subject to EE then the present
impasse would not exist."

 

There will always be the odd few exceptions like this, but overall I think
secular planning control has more to recommend it that ecclesiastical
exemption.

 

David



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.68/2507 - Release Date: 11/17/09
07:40:00


           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20091117/cd1e3a88/attachment.html>