[Bell Historians] Kelvedon

[matthewhigby at 6CA_TKAzzj9iIqf2ynswzWtRWIbQ0iUA6zqwx65Dy2eck62RGuGvPjM4GxvIi5aVPPS-7RCGWxNC2DQ.yahoo.invalid]

Mitch writes:
 
 
I wonder if the Bellfounders/I wonder if the Bellfounders/<WBR>hangers  
should take on the role of o main  Contractor. Along the lines of the Planning 
supervisor in the CDM regs. 
I realise that in some projects the bells are  only a small part of the 
whole job and therefore it wouldn't always be  possible.
 
I say:
 
Sounds a fair suggestion - however we have been trying to avoid getting  
caught up in all the CDM regulations and everything that comes along with  it. 
I have always claimed that the bellhanging trade is closer to  mechanical 
engineering trade than it is to the construction trade. So far,  eveyone 
seems happy with that, and it has saved us a heck of a lot of time &  pointless 
paperwork. 
 
Starting to oversee projects undertaken by the construction trade, would  
take up a hell of a lot of time, which we frankly (judging from previous  
experiences), wouldn't get paid for!
 
Best wishes,
 
Matthew
 

Matthew Higby  & Company Ltd,
Church Bell Engineers,
6 Hill  View,
Timsbury,
Bath,
BA2 0EL.
Tel: 01761  233757
www.bell-hangers.com
           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20091125/c8387274/attachment.html>