RE: [Bell Historians] Re:  Stoke, Please do this

John H Allen john at
Fri Apr 30 08:03:24 BST 2010



You will find that Stoke CC has amended the page.






From: bellhistorians at [mailto:bellhistorians at]
On Behalf Of Peter Rivet
Sent: Saturday 24 April 2010 22:08
To: bellhistorians at
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Re:  Stoke, Please do this



I have had a look at the Stoke City Council page and at present it wrongly
describes the application as being for "Conservation Area Consent".  This
category of application is used to deal with the demolition of unlisted
buildings in Conservation Areas.  The current proposal is in fact for Listed
Building Consent.  You may wish to make this point in your representations -
I shall in mine!


Peter Rivet


-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians at
[mailto:bellhistorians at]On Behalf Of David Bryant
Sent: 24 April 2010 20:08
To: bellhistorians at
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Re:  Stoke, Please do this


I'm sure you have thought out your scheme well - I was just asking a
question, that's all!




From: Dave <mailto:d.simpson11 at>  Simpson 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:03 PM

To: bellhistorians@ <mailto:bellhistorians at> 

Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Re:  Stoke, Please do this



The two war memorial bells are not the issue here. In fact we have the
support of a direct family member of one of the donors for the relocation.

We have thought out our case with care and will present it as such at the
council meeting as per our justification statement that John Allen has
already provided a link to.

It is not helpful at this stage and could be very damaging to the project
for people to start suggesting alternate schemes. 

David Simpson

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -
Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2831 - Release Date: 04/24/10

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list