[Bell Historians] Re: Bells on E-bay.

Richard Offen richard.offen at 6n72gIkKydXqtX9FrOxG3u3AgWM9mxNvdsKmtw5xQ-isy9wvHUFOF1SEsg6LAMfcIuvDrFBiq5m1WITgtyd4MA.yahoo.invalid
Tue Nov 23 16:37:14 GMT 2010


I am sure you are right but Cyril Johnston, and, after him, Michael Howard, clearly believed that a perfectly concentric bell was much easier to tune and control.

R

Sent from Richard Offen's iPhone

On 24/11/2010, at 12:29 AM, "Andrew Higson" <andrew.higson at tXFcWcPWcOeuzKtLoeAW8tQPAkYKgVsWDaUc_2_biMy1oCoxqM_qCZBfKo5AyTEWE6Lqg5Dji0xUGJ2uTlgRdRUIGbs.yahoo.invalidk> wrote:

> JT did some experimenting with the university on thick and thin bells and the effect that this caused; the conclusion was that bells were far more likely to have a wobble because of metallurgical effects rather than eccentricity.
> 
>  
> 
> Andrew Higson
> 
> John Taylor & Co.
> 
> The Bellfoundry
> 
> Freehold Street
> 
> Loughborough
> 
> LE11 1AR
> 
> Telephone: 01509 212241 Fax: 01509 263305 Registered in England No. 7032766
> 
> 
> 
> .
>  
> 
           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20101124/bdc21ff3/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list