[Bell Historians] Re: Bells on E-bay.
Richard Offen
richard.offen at 6n72gIkKydXqtX9FrOxG3u3AgWM9mxNvdsKmtw5xQ-isy9wvHUFOF1SEsg6LAMfcIuvDrFBiq5m1WITgtyd4MA.yahoo.invalid
Tue Nov 23 16:37:14 GMT 2010
I am sure you are right but Cyril Johnston, and, after him, Michael Howard, clearly believed that a perfectly concentric bell was much easier to tune and control.
R
Sent from Richard Offen's iPhone
On 24/11/2010, at 12:29 AM, "Andrew Higson" <andrew.higson at tXFcWcPWcOeuzKtLoeAW8tQPAkYKgVsWDaUc_2_biMy1oCoxqM_qCZBfKo5AyTEWE6Lqg5Dji0xUGJ2uTlgRdRUIGbs.yahoo.invalidk> wrote:
> JT did some experimenting with the university on thick and thin bells and the effect that this caused; the conclusion was that bells were far more likely to have a wobble because of metallurgical effects rather than eccentricity.
>
>
>
> Andrew Higson
>
> John Taylor & Co.
>
> The Bellfoundry
>
> Freehold Street
>
> Loughborough
>
> LE11 1AR
>
> Telephone: 01509 212241 Fax: 01509 263305 Registered in England No. 7032766
>
>
>
> .
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20101124/bdc21ff3/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list