[r-t] 42 different extents

[Samuel M. Austin]

Thanks for your replies but PABS has hit the nail on the head.

My plan was to ring 42 different extents of Union Bob Doubles using Bobs and 
Singles only.

Would this be the first time 42 different extents has been rung with only 
two types of call?

Is 42 different extents possible with only one type of call?

Aye

Sam



>Message: 5
>Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:23:21 +0100
>From: Philip Saddleton <pabs at cantab.net>
>Subject: Re: [r-t] 42 different extents
>To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>Message-ID: <44FC9949.6030807 at cantab.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Groups E and F (the ones with lh1 and cyclic lead heads) have plenty of
>potential. With bobs and singles and excluding rotations and reversals
>there are
>
>Two palindromic three parts (plus one with no plain leads) = 8
>Two asymmetric two parts = 24
>Six palindromic one parts = 72
>Four asymmetric one parts = 96
>
>Giving 200 extents with two types of call and a plain lead in each.
>
>Philip
>
>Samuel M. Austin said  on 04/09/2006 17:14:
> > Morning, has a peal been rung of a single doubles method in which every
> > extent was a different calling?
> >
> > Aye
> >
> > Sam
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>ringing-theory mailing list
>ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
>
>End of ringing-theory Digest, Vol 25, Issue 1
>*********************************************