[r-t] Easter challenge

[Richard Smith]

Ted Steele wrote:

> Strangely enough I was aware of those examples, but I guess I asked for some 
> such response. Seriously, I thought that Philip or some one else who 
> understands these things might come up with something constructive about 
> methods based upon a consistent rule which is applied without variation

All of Philip's examples were consistently applying a rule 
throughout.  Seriously, if you want what you would probably 
consider to be a sensible example, you'll need to give us a 
definition of what you consider to be a 'Dixonoid' or 
rule-based touch.  As far as I'm concerned the standard 720 
of Bob Minor is every bit as much 'rule-based' as Dixons -- 
perhaps more so as you get an extent without a complex 
touch.

RAS