[r-t] Double Cambridge cyclic bob Minor

[Graham John]

On Thu, 19 May 2011, edward martin wrote:

> Please forgive me, but  how was this method officially accepted & named
when
> others of similar falseness have not been accepted and named?



Double Cambridge Cyclic Bob Minor was first rung in a peal by the CUG on 23
Mar 2003. The report suggests two extents, but more likely a 1440. Both PJE
and RAS rang in it so may be able to confirm.

 

www.campanophile.com/view.aspx?10910

 

A problem with the current decisions is if it is NOT rung in a peal, then it
must be rung as an extent to be officially named. However, in this case, the
name was not really in doubt given that it is a clear contraction of the
higher stages.

 

Graham

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20110521/c636d57e/attachment-0004.html>