[r-t] New Alan Reading Composition

[Alan Reading]

Don is of course correct that not every lead realises the potential to
contain a run (because of the 8123, 7812, 6781 and reverses). However
assuming my count up is correct only 32 of the 168 leads don't contain one
of the 480 runs and on only 4 occasions in the peal do you get two
consecutive leads without one of the 480.

Cheers,
Alan

On 9 December 2012 03:22, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Philip Earis <pje24 at cantab.net> wrote:
> > But it is a good feature to have music in every lead, and
> > some blockbuster leads can also be nice, so sorry I missed this before.
>
> Though, of course, when you say "every lead" you're not, at least in
> this case, talking about every lead of the composition. For many,
> probably most, of the leads, the potential that they contain music (if
> you define music as 4 bell runs) is only fulfilled in five of the
> eight parts. Or am I missing something?
>
>
> --
> Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
> "It is tempting to call this unctuous ooze of status updates and
> vacation snaps seeping across Facebook and Twitter and the rest
> information overload. But that would be to debase the word
> 'information.'"  -- Roger Cohen, _New York Times_, 6 December 2012
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20121210/663b1a4d/attachment.html>