[r-t] New Alan Reading Composition

[Alan Reading]

They probably contain what you would describe as unquantifiable music
Glint,
rather like London Royal!

:-)


On 11 December 2012 09:24, Ian Fielding <Ian.Fielding at nbt.nhs.uk> wrote:

> So what you are basically saying is that 19% of the leads of the peal
> don't actually contain any music!
> :-)
>
> Ian Fielding
>
> Chief Pharmacy Technician
> North Bristol NHS Trust
> 0117 323 8846 (Southmead Hospital)
> 0117 340 6528 (Frenchay Hospital)
> 07872 995464 (Mobile)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ringing-theory [mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On
> Behalf Of Alan Reading
> Sent: 10 December 2012 18:22
> To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> Subject: Re: [r-t] New Alan Reading Composition
>
> Don is of course correct that not every lead realises the potential to
> contain a run (because of the 8123, 7812, 6781 and reverses). However
> assuming my count up is correct only 32 of the 168 leads don't contain one
> of the 480 runs and on only 4 occasions in the peal do you get two
> consecutive leads without one of the 480.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan
>
> On 9 December 2012 03:22, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Philip Earis <pje24 at cantab.net> wrote:
> > > But it is a good feature to have music in every lead, and some
> > > blockbuster leads can also be nice, so sorry I missed this before.
> >
> > Though, of course, when you say "every lead" you're not, at least in
> > this case, talking about every lead of the composition. For many,
> > probably most, of the leads, the potential that they contain music (if
> > you define music as 4 bell runs) is only fulfilled in five of the
> > eight parts. Or am I missing something?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
> > "It is tempting to call this unctuous ooze of status updates and
> > vacation snaps seeping across Facebook and Twitter and the rest
> > information overload. But that would be to debase the word
> > 'information.'"  -- Roger Cohen, _New York Times_, 6 December 2012
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ringing-theory mailing list
> > ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> > http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20121210/663b1a4d/attachment.html
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
> DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to
> this message by anyone else is unauthorised.  If you are not the intended
> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any
> action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
> unlawful.  Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
> message in error. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20121211/84efcf59/attachment.html>