robin at robinw.org.uk
Fri Jun 15 07:11:23 UTC 2012
It seems most churlish to point out that Robert Bennett's five part is
actually a rotation of the reversal of Hubbard's at p91 of Ropesight.
At *first* thought, it should be that any reversal of a comp. for group 'p'
methods should be true to group 'q' - but first thoughts can often be wrong!
The two Hubbard single-less peals are reversals as I remarked before.
More information about the ringing-theory