[r-t] Minor

[Alexander Holroyd]

On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Don Morrison wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Glenn Taylor <gaataylor at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> While you can't (with normal calls) get a sub-extent length, true touch of
>> symmetric, plain minor round at hand...
>
> How silly of me. What I meant (for some loose meaning of the verb "to
> mean") was "sub-extent length, true touch of a single symmetric, plain
> minor method."
>
> Of course I'm being equally silly again, as I'm sure there are plenty
> of further unstated assumptions I'm making, as well as likely mistakes
> in my reasoning. Sigh.

Well of course you could have a call affecting the treble...