[r-t] History

Lucy Woodward lucindareeve at aol.com
Fri Jun 6 14:37:42 UTC 2014

I totally agree with Mark on this.

But surely let us extend this respect to individuals by spelling their names correctly, viz Wyld.

Regards to All,



-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Davies <mark at snowtiger.net>
To: ringing-theory <ringing-theory at bellringers.net>
Sent: Fri, Jun 6, 2014 1:21 pm
Subject: Re: [r-t] History

Peter King writes,

> There are many peals that I wished had less than 5000 changes
 > but you have to establish some kind of benchmark and 5000
 > changes is reasonaqbloe enough and fully respects the history.

For Triples, I would say you are fully disrespecting history!

Recent history as well as ancient. Why should we care much about the 
heroic efforts of Wilde, Johnson et al if we can ring a peal of Stedman 
Triples with 5000 changes and bobs only?

Triples is the stage where a peal needs to be an extent.


ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list