[r-t] Recognising old peals

Don Morrison dfm at ringing.org
Wed Jun 11 00:30:55 UTC 2014

I agree, strongly. It's always seemed churlish that the Council often
records as the first to do something the second to have done it. Note that
there are potentially method names involved in such retroactive

On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk> wrote:

> Assuming that we are able to implement a new set of definitions and
> associated decisions, I think a really good motion to put to Council would
> be:-
> "To retrospectively recognise all peals rung to date, that if rung today
> would meet the [then] current decisions."
> I am sure that the Peal Records Committee wouldn't thank me, but
> recognising
> all those innovations of the past would be a great gesture.
> Graham
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net <javascript:;>
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net

Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"After all these years I have observed that beauty, like happiness,
is frequent. A day does not pass when we are not, for an instant,
in paradise."
        -- Jorge Luis Borges, _Los Conjurados_, tr Willis Barnstone

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list