[r-t] Doubles 240s
john at jaharrison.me.uk
Sun Mar 15 10:13:57 UTC 2015
> Don had proposed allowing to null change to enable 240s of Doubles with
> each row at hand and back.
> This is unnecessary. Some years ago, I produced 240s with this property,
> but using conventional bobs and 123-singles.
I don't recall him saying it was necessary (but I haven't looked up the
archive). I thought it was an example of a neat way to do it. It is
certainly one that might appeal to 'ordinary ringers' because it is simple
to understand and simple to call.
More information about the ringing-theory