[r-t] Methods collection

[Robert Lewis]

At 11:25 26/05/2015, RAS wrote:

>So the bastard was holding the methods collections as ransom against 
>the MC's report being rejected -- which would effectively have been 
>a vote of no confidence in the MC. How is that remotely acceptable behaviour?

If this is so it is quite clearly not acceptable.

Perhaps someone will write a letter for inclusion in next week's RW?

RAL