[r-t] [rt-rules-subgroup] Re: Extension [was Differential [was Version 5.4 - norms]]

[Mark Davies]

Don writes,

> ​Just making sure I understand: am I correct in believing that what you
> call "Ashford Little Bob Major" is what the Central Council in its wisdom
> prefers to call "Un-Saiph Little Bob Major"?

Correct, except the "wisdom" is not the Central Council but Peter Bevis 
and Tony Smith.

I would prefer this method to be viewed as an extension of Ashford 
Little Bob Triples (itself an extension of the Doubles).

MBD

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus