[r-t] One more thing Re: uncovered triples (was Unclassified)

[Don Morrison]

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Robin Woolley <robin at robinw.org.uk> wrote:
> Remember, the CC was always happy to 'recognise' un-covered triples
> if there was a good reason to.

Even if this were true, what's up with "if there was a good reason to"? Why
is a better one required than simply "because the band chose to ring it"?

If we needed a better reason than that to ring peals there would be
precious few of Lincolnshire Major allowed.


-- 
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"It is only a dying cause which can attain to perfect taste."
       -- John Buchan, _A Lodge in the Wilderness_
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20160605/2688e0a0/attachment.html>