[r-t] Blocks to be renamed as methods
ianmcc at physics.uq.edu.au
Tue Apr 18 10:22:32 UTC 2017
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Rebecca Cox wrote:
> Can anyone explain to me how a `method' or `block' can contain the place
> notation xx when x is already recognised as a lead of Cross Differential and
> so xx is a plain course of Cross Differential and thus a method in its own
> right. The so-called `Pudsey Block/Delight Minor' is simply spliced Cross
> Differential and Morland Alliance and the other minor blocks already are
> simply splices/mixes of unrung alliance methods &-36-14-16-12-56,12 and
> &-36-14-16-14-16,12 with Cross Differential. The idea that a `method' can
> contain complete plain courses of another method embedded in it seems
> completely wrong to me.
That is very funny! But how does Cross Differential exist? Isn't it just
Original with a non-standard call?
More information about the ringing-theory