[r-t] Blocks to be renamed as methods

[Ian McCulloch]

On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Rebecca Cox wrote:

> Can anyone explain to me how a `method' or `block' can contain the place 
> notation xx when x is already recognised as a lead of Cross Differential and 
> so xx is a plain course of Cross Differential and thus a method in its own 
> right. The so-called `Pudsey Block/Delight Minor' is simply spliced Cross 
> Differential and Morland Alliance and the other minor blocks already are 
> simply splices/mixes of unrung alliance methods &-36-14-16-12-56,12 and 
> &-36-14-16-14-16,12 with Cross Differential. The idea that a `method' can 
> contain complete plain courses of another method embedded in it seems 
> completely wrong to me.

That is very funny!  But how does Cross Differential exist?  Isn't it just 
Original with a non-standard call?

Cheers,
Ian