[r-t] "X above, Y below"

[Alan Reading]

Oh sorry my misunderstanding - just re-read the original post.
I thought Graham's remark about Bristol / Double Dublin was tongue in cheek!

On Tuesday, 1 August 2017, Alan Reading <alan.reading at googlemail.com> wrote:

> I think you've got the place notation of Double Dublin wrong - the first
> 58 should be a 56.
>
> Bristol and Double Dublin both have the same rows at the quarter leads so
> substituting over / underworks can't have a transpositional effect.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan
>
> On Tuesday, 1 August 2017, Pip Dillistone <tuftyfrog at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tuftyfrog at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 1 Aug 2017, at 19:37, Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Bristol and Double Dublin might work well.
>> >
>> > Graham
>>
>> With Bristol below and Double Dublin above you get a 2-3 differential
>> with 2 and 3 both hunt bells:
>>
>> https://complib.org/method/32289?accessKey=f8fac86bb06c104f8
>> 4fdb9201f26a7ea0bef08c6
>>
>> Pip
>> _______________________________________________
>> ringing-theory mailing list
>> ringing-theory at bellringers.org
>> http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/listinfo/ringing-theory
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20170801/d126a5ef/attachment.html>