[r-t] Update on jump methods

[Daniel Brady]

Hi Tim,

I can confirm that Bourne Treble Jump was rung as you have described.

thanks,

Daniel

On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 10:25 AM Jonathan Agg <jonathan.agg at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tim,
>
> The RW reference for Stedman Jump is 5425.0373
> http://peals.co.uk/pealdetails.asp?serno=T2013/4234
>
> Cheers,
> Jonathan
>
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 00:28, Tim Barnes <tjbarnes23 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Under the Framework's retroactive recognition provisions, the CC Methods
>> team is in the process of adding methods to the Methods Library that were
>> rung and named in the past, but which did not qualify for inclusion in the
>> Library at the time.  Over 700 such methods have been added so far -- a
>> listing is available here:
>>
>> https://complib.org/report?name=retroactiverecognition
>>
>> The requirement for retroactive recognition is that a method was rung in
>> a performance that would have qualified it for inclusion in the Library had
>> the Framework been in place at the time of the performance.
>>
>> One set of methods we're working on adding to the Library are those that
>> include jump changes.  The table below shows the jump methods we're aware
>> of, many of which were rung by members of this list.  There are a few open
>> points as shown in the Comments column.  If anyone can provide any info on
>> these, please let us know either via this list or at methods at cccbr.org.uk.
>> Please also let us know if there are any other rung jump methods that
>> should be added to the Library.
>>
>> The Framework classifies any method with jump changes as "Jump", and Jump
>> is included in the method's title.  So, for example, Cambridge Treble Jump
>> Minor will be given a method name of "Cambridge Treble", it will have a
>> classification of "Jump", and so its title will be "Cambridge Treble Jump
>> Minor".  This gives sensible results for all the methods below, with the
>> possible exception of Jump Stedman Doubles, which would become Jump Stedman
>> Jump Doubles.  We've reached out to the band that rang this to see if they
>> would like to rename it.
>>
>> The other question that arises in adding these methods to the Library is
>> how to notate jump changes.  I'll send another note shortly that has the
>> Method team's proposal on this (and which explains notations such as (24)
>> below).
>>
>> # Title Notation Reference Comments
>> 1 Cambridge Treble Jump Minor x3x(24)x2x(35)x4x5,2 RW1976/357
>> 2 London Treble Jump Minor 3x3.(24)x2x(35).4x4.3,2 RW1979/979
>> 3 Beverley Treble Jump Minor x3x(24)x2x(35).4x34.5,2 RW1979/1057
>> 4 Durham Treble Jump Minor x3x(24)x2x(35).4x34.1,2 RW1979/1057
>> 5 Norwich Treble Jump Minor x34x(24)x2x(35)x34x1,1 RW1979/1057
>> 6 Surfleet Treble Jump Minor x3x(24)x2x(35).4x2.5,2 RW1979/1057
>> 7 Wells Treble Jump Minor 3x3.(24)x2x(35).4x34.1,2 RW1979/1057
>> 8 Newham Treble Jump Minor   RW1984/175 Notation not published - need to
>> obtain it
>> 9 Double Oxford Jump Minor x(24)x(35)x5,2 RW2002/1073 Confirm shouldn't
>> have 'Treble' in method name
>> 10 Mersey Ferry Treble Jump Minor (13)4.(35)x3(64).(42)x BB Jun 1st
>> 2003, not found in RW
>> 11 Jump Stedman Doubles 3.1.5.(31).(31).(31).(31).(31).5.3.1.3,1 BB Sep
>> 11th 2008 and RW2008/1261 Will become Jump Stedman Jump Doubles. Change
>> name?
>> 12 Stedman Jump Triples 7,(13).(13).(13).(13).(13).7 BB Jan 12th 2013,
>> not found in RW
>> 13 Bourne Treble Jump Minor x3x(24)x2x(35)x34x3,2 RW2016/306 Notation
>> not published - confirm this is as expected
>> 14 York Treble Jump Minor x3x(24)x2x(35).4x4.3,2 No known performances DFM
>> has this recorded in ringing.org but unsure of origin
>> Regards
>> Tim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ringing-theory mailing list
>> ringing-theory at bellringers.org
>> https://bellringers.org/listinfo/ringing-theory
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.org
> https://bellringers.org/listinfo/ringing-theory
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.org/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20191209/04a630fe/attachment-0001.html>