[Bell Historians] Heaviest bells on plain bearings
matthewhigby at oKGOvJMYhywjsgdGeahUppWejSVNYQbLU9ZHRXzoi6sKOOMqlGeUbrRqooDT7fZRmzF2KnhPUOrZHwZ_I-oH.yahoo.invalid
matthewhigby at oKGOvJMYhywjsgdGeahUppWejSVNYQbLU9ZHRXzoi6sKOOMqlGeUbrRqooDT7fZRmzF2KnhPUOrZHwZ_I-oH.yahoo.invalid
Sun Aug 12 08:54:43 BST 2007
In a message dated 12/08/2007 00:46:02 GMT Standard Time,
davidbryant at 4ry8XB5nwTD4d57wVOqjpqzaYuQJQbknR9aTddoACBmQbRfL_akekrufhuGJB_iZcHldDmxDLpEcb40RC8fGvgM.yahoo.invalid writes:
> > On Friday I had a discussion about where the heaviest
> > ringable ring of bells were that remained on plain bearings.
> > The best we came up with was Clare, Suffolk at 28 cwt.
> > Does anyone have any advances on that?
Congresbury (34cwt) are still on plain bearings. Long Ashton (30cwt) also.
One bell at each tower has been recently rehung but I'm not sure if they are
on ball bearings or plain again.
Matthew
Matthew Higby & Co Ltd,
Church Bell Engineers.
Jasmine Cottage,
The Street,
Chilcompton,
Bath,
BA3 4HN.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20070812/834c771b/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list