[Bell Historians] 16th and 17th century tuning

Richard Offen richard.offen at 4ZQcQPMUmIpbDoDdMYwY1FdQnw61nIWMhLbOYqA16kfq7JHOMVlihhXr9epgzmd2A21Fq4mIv8DA1DGhBRnjsA.yahoo.invalid
Mon Aug 11 14:52:47 BST 2008


Not much help I’m afraid as they were tuned by Whitechapel in the 1950s.

 

R

 

   _____  

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Bickerton, Roderic (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Sent: Monday, 11 August 2008 6:18 PM
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] 16th and 17th century tuning

 

What evidence is there from complete rings:


Smithfield London, Gr Lon
S Bartholomew Gt


Bell

Weight

Nominal

Note

Diameter

Cast

Founder

Canons


1

2cwt

 

F#

22.00 "

c1510†

Thomas Bullisdon

Y


2

2¾cwt

 

E

24.00 "

c1510†

Thomas Bullisdon

Y


3

3½cwt

 

D#

26.50 "

c1510†

Thomas Bullisdon

Y


4

4¼cwt

 

C#

29.00 "

c1510†

Thomas Bullisdon

Y


5

5½cwt

 

B

31.00 "

c1510†

Thomas Bullisdon

Y

 

   _____  

From: bellhistorians at -yahoogroups.-com
[mailto:bellhistori-ans at yahoogroups.-com] On Behalf Of Richard Smith
Sent: 11 August 2008 11:04
To: bellhistorians at -yahoogroups.-com
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] 16th and 17th century tuning


*** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet. 
Keep this in mind if you answer this message. 

Richard Offen wrote:

> > Is anyone aware of any research into how the tuning of rings
> > of bells evolved during the 16th and 17th centuries?
>
> "HYPERLINK
"http://www.hibberts.co.uk/index.htm"http://www.hibberts-.co.uk/index.-htm"
> "HYPERLINK
"http://www.kirnberger.fsnet.co.uk/"http://www.kirnberg-er.fsnet.-co.uk/"

Interesting though both of these are, I'm not sure either 
really touch on what I'm interested on. Or perhaps they do, 
and I haven't managed to locate the relevant parts, in which 
case a pointer would be appreciated.

The only passage I can find that is slightly relevant to the 
introduction of a major scale in rings of bells is the 
following paragraph on Nigel Taylor's site:

| Until the 17th century, few churches had more than four 
| bells. These rarely formed a scale; this was of little 
| consequence as each bell was used for a specific purpose, 
| such as the curfew, sanctus, or tolling for the dead. 
| Little, if any attempt was made to tune additional bells 
| to sound in tune with existing ones. In the mid-17th century, 
| English change-ringing was beginning to develop, and with 
| it the demand for greater numbers of bells in a set. For 
| change-ringing to make any sense, clearly the bells must 
| form a recognisable scale.

But this doesn't seem wholly compatible with John Eisel's 
essay 'Change Ringing: The History of an English Art, Vol 1' 
where he says:

| In the middle of the sixteenth century we have the results 
| of the first surveys on the numbers of church bells. 
| [...] The weights of the bells show that the bells would 
| have formed a ring and this is emphasised by the returns 
| of the Commissioners for the Hundred of Framland in 
| Leicestershire. Three parishes each had 'iij bells of a 
| corde', Croxton Kerrial had 'iiij bells of a ryng', and 
| Muston had 'iiij bells of one ryng'.
|
| A study of the 1552 and 1553 inventories shows that most 
| parish churches had between three and five bells, although 
| some had fewer and a handful had more.

I would be interested in what is known about the tuning of 
rings from this period. Heinrich Glarean didn't publish 
'Dodecachordon' until 1547, and this is usually credited as 
the point when the major scale (his Ionian mode) was 
introduced, so it would seem surprising if this was in many 
mid-16th century rings of bells.

Richard


SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex
SS14 3EL
A company registered in England Wales. Company no. 02426132
************-*********-*********-*********-*********-*********-*********-**
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
************-*********-*********-*********-*********-*********-*********-**

 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.526 / Virus Database: 270.6.0/1603 - Release Date: 10/08/2008
6:13 PM



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.526 / Virus Database: 270.6.0/1603 - Release Date: 10/08/2008
6:13 PM
 
           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20080811/496bf158/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list